Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have delivered a new tranche of records to Capitol Hill, reviving long-running allegations that federal officials slow-walked or suppressed inquiries into the Clinton Foundation during the Obama years. The documents, transmitted in recent days to the Senate Judiciary Committee, sketch how international donors and a domestic military contractor allegedly sought access to the Clintons through contributions made while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State.
According to individuals familiar with the files, writes Just The News, some of the underlying information had been flagged years earlier by whistleblowers. They contend the material never reached decision-makers during a 2015 corruption review led by the U.S. attorney’s office in Little Rock, a probe they say was curtailed after guidance from senior Justice Department leadership. As one insider with direct knowledge of the records put it, “There was an effort ‘to obstruct legitimate inquiries into the Foundation by blocking real investigation by line-level FBI agents and DOJ field prosecutors and keeping them from following the money.’”
Officials have been referring to the collection as the “Clinton corruption files,” the result of weeks of assembly and classification reviews. Bondi and Patel intend to declassify and release the packet publicly by the end of the week, provided informant identities can be protected.
The timing overlaps with expected disclosures from the Arctic Frost inquiry overseen by Special Counsel Jack Smith, including previously unseen communications between Smith and former FBI Director Christopher Wray and details surrounding efforts to obtain lawmakers’ call records during the Trump-related investigation. Earlier reporting indicated the FBI once pursued at least three separate lines of inquiry into suspected quid pro quo arrangements at the Clinton Foundation, all of which were shut down after then–Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates ordered agents to “shut it down.”
The latest records are positioned to show how line agents and field prosecutors allegedly kept key leads from advancing during those stalled examinations. As Congress reviews the submission, the episode is likely to reignite arguments over political fundraising, federal oversight, and the institutional decisions that shaped high-profile investigations across the 2010s.
[Read More: IOC Makes Major Change]
